Banter


The irony of Silliman’s post about wanting to sue the creators of Issue 1 is that he posted the entire list of “contributors” to the volume on his blog. Of course, he merely cut-and-pasted it, but he doesn’t say that, and the implication is that he typed the list himself.

http://ronsilliman.blogspot.com/2008/10/one-advantage-of-e-books-is-that-you.html

The most “creative” aspect of Issue 1 was the collection of author’s names. One of Silliman’s favorite critical tactics (see the introduction to the In The American Tree and Art of Practice) is the list of excluded poets. By cutting-and-pasting this list on your blog without clear attribution, within the context of understanding that the mere list of poet names is a form of criticism, you are committing a sort of plagiarism not unlike the — whatever it is that Silliman is accusing the creators of Issue 1 of havng done.

He should redo the post and type the names in from scratch (the difference in typeface is the dead giveaway that it was pasted in). Or at least include the list author’s names (which, I suppose, he really can’t).

Or something like that — I’m really just pointing out an irony. Don’t ask me why I’ve decided to comment on this now, but Kenny Goldsmith gave a very interesting presentation at Untitled: Speculation of the Expanded Field of Writing conference here in Los Angeles that ended with a great discussion of the project — though, strangely, Kenny neglected to include the list in his excerpt from the blog post.

03departed2.jpg

+

Sadakichi.jpg

=

avatar.jpg

Which is to say, how I ended up looking like a cross between Leonardo DiCaprio and Sadakichi Hartmann in my avatar for The Godfather video game is beyond me.

 

Useful things I have done this morning:

  • ordered a sexy brand new Olivetti MS25 manual typewriter (very exciting)
  • went through pile of boring mail
  • bought a can of Chock Full O’ Nuts heavenly coffee
  • brewed coffee (yum)
  • reviewed, once again, local catteries that have available Sphynx kittens
  • emptied the dehumidifier in the basement
  • bought first ever, rather anemic Sunday edition of Philadelphia Inquirer (yet unread)
  • put up Flickr photos of my new house

It’s this last item that prompts the present blog entry. I really don’t think this is all that interesting, but blog posts have been few and far between, and my house is my life for the moment. I tried to make the comments entertaining.

1240515921_366d6fa160.jpg

1241385324_1bc86afe79.jpg

Quebec has a rather strange history when it comes to poets who are more or less linked with Modernism, at least among the menfolk.

Claude Gauvreau, for instance, associated with the group of Automatiste artists such as Paul-Emile Borduas and Jean-Paul Riopelle, wrote several theatrical works usually considered as extreme as Artaud’s, and yet he jumped (or fell) off a building in 1971, and had been hospitalized ten times for psychological disorders prior to that. Two books of his have been translated by Ray Ellenwood — Entrails and The Charge of the Expormidable Moose — and Steve McCaffery has a nice essay on his poetry in North of Intention. Wikipedia has an English-language biography.

Hector de Saint-Denys Garneau is usually considered the first truly modern Quebec poet, and despite being rather good-looking, he died of a heart attack while canoeing in 1943 at the age of 31. He also has a Wikipedia biography. I’ve enjoyed reading his poems in translation, and he seems to be popular enough with the young Quebec crowd to have inspired a short video based on one of his poems which appears on YouTube. Most videos based on poems seem to be pretty bad, but this one fares reasonably well despite some hammy acting.

Next to lastly is Sylvain Garneau, no relation to the above poet, who wrote mostly rhyming verse in quatrains and other forms. His work comes across remarkably well in translation, sounding a bit like a cross between Brecht of Die Dreigroschenopfer and Jacques Brel. There’s no complete English-language edition of his work, which inspires me to give it a shot myself, since I love Brecht and Brel. Also apparently a dashing fellow (I’ll let you be the judge — at least he dressed well), he committed suicide at the age of 23 in 1953. The Canadian Encyclopedia has a good biography of him, as they do of the other poets mentioned here.

Before all of these blokes, however, was the poet Emile Nelligan, who lived to the ripe age of 62 but was hospitalized at 19 for what appears to be schizophrenia and wrote nearly nothing afterwards, living out his days in the asylum in near total indifference to the world. Born in 1879, he read widely in French Symbolist literature, especially Baudelaire and Verlaine and two poets I know nothing about, Rodenbach and Rollinat. He might have read Rimbaud, but it’s not clear given the availability of the literature in Quebec and Rimbaud’s unusual publishing history.

Anyway, I sort of “discovered” Nelligan during my last year at college while on a trip to Quebec City with my family. I walked into a bookstore looking for the “Canadian Rimbaud” — since I have a pet theory that every country has their Rimbaud, troubled adolescent genius who wrote their entire works before the age of 20 or so, and I was obsessed with Rimbaud at the time — and saw Nelligan’s photograph and bust (the bookstore was selling small plaster statues of him) and knew instantly, without looking at the books or reading a bio, that this was him. I think it’s because his photograph reminded me of the famous photographs of Rimbaud during his “seer” phase in Paris which you’ve all seen.

claire01.jpg

Turned out to be sort of true — Nelligan wasn’t nearly as original as Rimbaud, but he was a “visionary,” and he still seems to be the central point of inspiration for many Quebec poets wanting to push the boundaries. I ended up translating four of Nelligan’s poems for my senior project at Bard, two of which appear below (I got the other two very wrong in places, I don’t know French all that well). They may seem a little olde fashioned but I think they still hold up. There’s a really nice selection of translations available by P.F. Widdows, and a more awkward but readable complete edition by Fred Cogswell.

(Nelligan has a huge hotel in Montreal named after him; Sylvain Garneau has a library. Walt Whitman has a rest stop — just like Joyce Kilmer!)

You’ll notice — those of you who read or speak French — that I use some rather literal word choices, for example “massive” for “massif,” which would not really be accurate translations. I did this on purpose since I like to use the original language in a translation to “deterritorialize” or render strange the English of the new poem. Also, Nelligan fans, you’ll notice that the “ideal ocean” in the original is where hurricanes don’t swirl, but having that Rimbaud itch, I made the waters rather torrential.

Petition

from Emile Nelligan

Queen, will you assent to unfurl just one curl,
One billow of your hair for the blades of scissors?
I want to inhale just one note of the birdsong
Of this night of love, born from your eyes of pearl.

My heart’s bouquet, trills of its thicket,
In there your spirit plays its roseate flute.
Queen, will you assent to unfurl just one curl,
One billow of your hair for the blades of scissors?

Silken flowers, perfumes of roses, lilies,
I want to return them with a secret envelope.
They were in Eden. One day we’ll take ship
On the ideal ocean, where the hurricane swirls!

Queen, will you assent to unfurl just one curl?

The Ship of Gold

from Emile Nelligan

There was a mighty ship carved of massive gold:
Its masts touched the azure, on the unknown seas;
The Cyprus of love, hair loose, with nude torso
Stretched herself on its prows, in excessive suns.

One night, however, there came the great danger
In those clever oceans where the Sirens sing;
This horrible shipwreck inclined the ship’s bottom
Toward the depths of the abyss, unchanging grave.

There was a ship of gold, and its diaphanous flanks
Displayed its rich hold to those profane sailors,
Disgust, Hate, and Nerves… they split it between them.

What is left of the ship from that so brief Tempest?
What has my heart become, but a deserted ship?
Alas! it has foundered on the vacuum of the dream.

I’ve read a lot of really good (and some so-so) books this summer, and have half-read almost as many. Here they are, as recommendations, or for no particular reason, in no particular order. (“Summer” for me this year means May until now, with a dash of April while the semester was winding down.) I hope to do some reviews, probably of the gaming ones, after I set up shop in the new house.

Piero Heliczer, A Purchase in the White Botanica (poetry)
Virginia Woolf, Orlando (novel)
Rick Moody, Purple America (novel)
McKenzie Wark, Gamer Theory (theory)
Chris Crawford, Chris Crawford on Game Design (theory)
John Nathan, Mishima: A Biography (biography)
George Battaille, My Mother/Madame Edwarda/The Dead Man (novellas)
Jill Magi, Threads (poetry)
Jeremy Reed, Scott Walker: Another Tear Falls (music)
Johny Rogan, Morrissey and Marr: The Severed Alliance (music)
Claude Levi-Strauss, Tristes Tropiques (memoire/anthropology)
Kester Rattebury et al., Architecture Today (art)
Philadelphia Architecture: A Guide to the City (art)
Isabelle Eberhardt, The Oblivion Seekers (stories)
Jessica Smith, Organic Future Cellar (poetry)
Yukio Mishima, Madame Sade (play)
Alexander R. Galloway, Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture (theory)
Lewis Williams, Scott Walker: The Rhymes of Goodbye (music)
Raymond Radiguet, Count D’Orgel (novel)
Octave Mirbeau, Torture Garden (novel)
ActionScript 3.0 Animation (programming)
Ryan Daley, Armored Elevator (poetry)
Erika Fishcer, Aimee et Jaguar (biography)
Marilyn Hacker, Love, Death and the Changing of the Seasons (poetry)
Joshua Clover, The Totality for Kids (poetry)
Andre Breton, Mad Love (prose)
Stephen Dunn, Riffs & Reciprocities (prose poems)
Roger Callois, Man, Play and Games (theory)
Johan Huizinga, Homo Ludens (theory)
Marjorie Welish, The Annotated “Here” and Selected Poems (poetry)
Ford Madox Ford, The Good Soldier (novel)

I have a pretty bad tendency of putting books down and finishing them some months later. These are books I’m at least a third of the way through:

Christian Hawkey, The Book & Funnels (poetry)
John Clare, “I Am” The Selected Poetry (poetry)
Samuel Greenberg, Poems (poetry)
Rodney Koeneke, Musee Mechanique (poems)
Stephane Mallarme, Divigations (prose)
Gertrude Stein, Fernhurst, Q.E.D. and other early writings (novellas)
Lorine Neidecker, Collected Works (poetry)
Flash MX Game Design Demystified (programming)
AI for Game Developers (programming)
Ian Bogast, Unit Operations (theory)
Nick Montfort, Twisty Little Passages (criticism)
Peter Handke, Kaspar and Other Plays (plays)
Erik Ehn, The Saint Plays (plays)
Pierre Guyotat, Eden Eden Eden (novel)
Geoffrey Eugenides, Middlesex (novel)
Tony Hoagland, Donkey Gospel (poetry)
Rogert Shattuck, Forbidden Knowledge (criticism)
Ronald Hayman, Theatre and Ant-Theatre (criticism)

Most importantly, though — even if it doesn’t count as reading, it is research, of sorts — is that I finished Shadow of the Colossus. Big deal? Well, I haven’t really played a video game in, oh, probably decades, certainly not with those new-fangled controllers, and this is an amazing one and took quite a long time (at least by my TV-weary standards).

If you don’t play video games, or don’t have a PS2, borrow one or go to a friend’s house and play this one, you won’t regret it. Not to sound like a snob, but it’s the first mainstream video game I’ve played that really convinced me of the cultural import of video games, for reasons I won’t describe now (and that don’t have only to do with the visual appeal). But I haven’t played a lot lately except for a bunch of experimental on-line things.

image04.jpg

I’m not sure which of these two is better, the original film of wild solo by Branca in a NYC loft in 1978 or the algorithmic re-edit of the footage circa 2007 with Max/MSP (Jitter). I wanted to learn Jitter just so I could do work like this — check out my Flash Polaroids for algorithmic editing of photographs — but never got very far with it. I also didn’t like the reduced image quality, but it’s perfect for Branca imagery — bad compression of mediocre super-8 equals good clean fun — and the sound is great.

Analog versus digital — a goon with a tie, guitar and amp attacking music as we know it versus a geek with a laptop and software playing techno primitive, but in the same avant-garde tradition created by aforementioned goon. Analog has never looked or sounded better since digital music and video entered the scene, but I think it’s all becoming one big mix now, the one feeding off the other, and original of an original of a copy. Well, I’m black and white with envy.

Reminds me of the fact Guy Maddin, for all of his simplicity in terms of the machines he uses — one of his favorite special effects tricks when shooting is rubbing Vaseline on the lens — is a way ahead of the curve in terms of editing. Check out “Sissy Boy Slap Party” if you can find it on DVD (don’t watch the YouTube version, the magic is lost at that frame rate), or “The Heart of the World.”

Here are videos from each of the stages of Scott Walker’s career — enough to get you started in any cocktail conversation — from his early days as teen idol with the Walker Brothers to his early solo career (notable for his covers of Jacques Brel tunes but also his wonderfully orchestral original material), then on to the darker solo material which is really indescribable. He hasn’t performed live for several decades, but did do a few television appearances, which is the fourth vid here. The final one is from “The Drift,” his release from 2006 — a beautiful video in itself.

Walker (his real name is Noel Scott Engel) has become my big music obsession over the past year, and I highly recommend nearly everything he’s done, even the early pop stuff, since his baritone is so distinctive for being at once affectless (he trained himself to erase any vibrato from his singing) and yet rich and fluid. He was a big influence on David Bowie (who covered the Walker Brothers’ “Nite Flights”) and Bryan Ferry when he decided go all new Romantic on our ass (don’t blame Walker for that).

Walker, notable for being a recluse and walking away (puns!) from fame and money in the sixties, is now putting out one album every, oh, ten years or so, partly because he couldn’t get a contract, which is too bad but it seems like he’ll be recording more with all of the attention he’s been getting — a couple of recent books about his life and music, a feature length documentary called 30 Century Man, and now mention on Free Space Comix: the blog! If you don’t believe me when I say he’s genuinely strange and brilliant, watch “Rosary” first!

(BTW, for all you trivia buffs, the background singer on “Track 3” — which doesn’t seem to be loading properly, but maybe will straighten out later — is Billy Ocean!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTljMHlyA1o
“The Sun Ain’t Gonna Shine Anymore”


“Jackie”


“Track 3” (preceded by “The Sun” live recording and an interview)


“Rosary”


“Jesse”

Someone put up a Wikipedia entry about me. Pretty cool, I guess. Makes me feel like a statue primed and ready for pigeon droppings.

PigeonPoopsOnGirl.jpg

I placed a bid today on a house in Philadelphia. All I can say is watch this video to get any impression of my mood right now, and of what I imagine happening at la Casa de Stefans. All of these ladies are invited to my house on closing day!

Here’s a picture, kind of boxy (like much of Philadelphia) but in its own strange, Charles Brockden Brown-ish (the Poe of Philly) way, glorious. It reminds me, not a little bit, of Ezra Pound’s flat in Kensington Gardens, except with stray newspapers and cans, instead of skeins of loose silk, littering the adjoining empty lot.

5014709.jpg

I should mention that my nabe (future nabe, don’t jinx me) has had a reputation for not being friendly to “non-whites” — that bare wall seems ripe for some anti-Korean symbol to adorn it — at least as related to me by a local bar owner. But I’m quite confident that they will all love me as much as you, my blog readers, already do. And I think the apparent provinciality of Fishtown (yes, it’s called Fishtown) is over-stated.

Really, it’s a great place, just read THIS:

Beautifully renovated home in HOT area. Large 4 bedroom end unit is ready to move in. When you enter, you will notice the 9+ foot ceilings and new laminate flooring throughout the first floor. The living room (and entire house) has been professionally and beautifully painted. The dining room is spacious and has a powder room neatly located in the corner. The kitchen boasts new cabinets, sink, dishwasher, and range. The back yard provides privacy and is landscaped. The second and third floors each have two bedrooms. The second floor has an ENORMOUS hall bath w/ceramic tile. New w/w carpet runs throughout both floors. Other upgrades include newly coated roof, new windows through out, new heater, new water heater, upgraded plumbing, and updated electric. Block has had complete make-over (many other homes already renovated or nearing completion). Near the proposed casinos – make this your home and enjoy the financial appreciation to come!

This is all true. “Near the casinos” is a little frightening but they haven’t been built yet, I might be out by then, and they are on the other side of a huge highway, right on the water (I am not near the water at all) — just a sales pitch, in fact. I’d rather have that than a new basketball stadium (Philadelphia teams SUCK), though I think the design for the Nets stadium in Park Slope is actually quite gorgeous.

In addition to my albatross, “Introduction to New Media Studies,” I am teaching the following courses next year at The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey. I encourage all of you to apply.

LITT 3127: Modernist Literature
A broad survey of literature of the “modern” period (approximately 1900-1950) in Europe and America, with an emphasis on formal innovation — Brecht’s “epic theater,” Woolf’s stream-of-consciousness, Eliot’s use of pastiche, etc. – with some consideration of concurrent developments in the visual arts, music, philosophy and technology. 

LITT 3xxx: Experimental Writing Workshop
Prerequisite: Intro to Creative Writing
A workshop geared toward the writer – poet, playwright, story and non-fiction writer – who wishes to experiment with a wide array of writing practices and formal strategies, both traditional (sestinas, villanelles, alliterative verse) and experimental (cut-ups, constraint-based, visual, hypertext, etc.).

LITT 2xxx: Video Game Narrative Studies
An introductory course that examines where fields of ludology — the study of games — and narratology — the study of story and plot — converge, including sessions on indie games, MMORPGs, serial fictions, social represtentation and game design “auteurs.” CSIS and ARTV students encouraged to apply.

GAH 3xxx: American Experimental Theater
A survey of contemporary poetic and experimental theater, including established figures such as Mac Wellman, Richard Foreman, The Wooster Group, Sam Shepherd, Maria Irene Fornes, Spalding Gray, Charles Mee and Susan-Lori Parks and newcomers Richard Maxwell, Young Jean Lee, Madelyn Kent and International WOW Company.

This might very well qualify as my first ever autobiographical post on this or any other blog with the exception of Facebook, where I mostly just lie. But anyway, these are my summer plans (because, alas, I have them!).

  1. Figure out how to break my lease in my present apartment without losing lots and lots of money (and my dignity).
  2. Put all of my stuff in storage and go to Montreal for two months and live in a cheap (even free) room and learn French.
  3. Develop my several new classes for Stockton College, including Modernist Literature, Video Game Narrative Studies, and American Experimental Theater. (By “develop” I mean learn something about these subjects — like, read shit. And play LOTS of video games…).
  4. Develop a handful of new sites for Stockton such as the NMS site and something called “The Fhiz” (which might very well be “The Flaht”).
  5. Finish the websites for friends that I have already been paid for that I have been putting off for two and a half years.
  6. Drive my car to New Mexico for no other reason than to listen to a lot of music and because Vincent Gallo did it.
  7. Find a new apartment in Philadelphia. (Near the Chinatown bus. Near the hipsters of Fishtown. Near the art galleries. Near something.)
  8. Drive to Bard, drive to Long Island, drive to New Jersey, oh just drive.
  9. Writing projects: I have three plays I want to write (or one play that has three stories, not quite sure — all about DAMAGED PEOPLE) and a short novel that takes place in Philadelphia in the 19th century, soon after the completion of the Eiffel Tower in Philadelphia’s City Center (you see, France had offered us this crappy statue of a woman holding a bunch of flowers but we declined — not modern (read: masculine) enough — so they gave us, instead, this other thing that was in the works, a big pointy triangular phallus-type thing made entirely of metal — a metal banana! — which we liked and thought would be a great place to hang the Liberty Bell, hence its placement in this great city and not off the coast of the East Village — the premise of my novel. Oh, and it’s steampunk).
  10. Do something about the screenplays I have written (like, burn them).

I have other things in mind, but ten is a good number. Interpersonal stuff? I haven’t gotten to that stage on my blog. But in case you ever need to call me, or target me for some dastardly deed, at least you know, roughly, where I be.

Here’s something personal: I might get a CAT.

1. What do you consider the most essential difference between “literature” in the age of print and “literature” in the age of programmable media? Is “literature” an obsolescent word?

I don’t think “literature” is any more obsolete a word than it has been. Cultural studies has permitted a lot more material to the realm of literature than new media has, in a way, because of the lowbrow/highbrow issues it dealt with. I think things like Young-Hae Chang’s work should be considered “literature” even if it is in a genre that is entirely new and unique to itself. I have a pet theory that all successful works of new media literature create their own genres – that seems part of the point. And the Oulipo suggested that the series of constraints that govern a work are the “literature” itself. John Cage’s work is “literature” though he is often discussed in terms of his techniques rather than through, say, “close reading.” I don’t think that novels or plays or print poems will go away, and only changes in consciousness – such as the switch from Enlightenment ideas of literature to Romantic – really make changes. So whatever changes that new media has brought about in that way are the important issues, not the technology or even the techniques used in writing (though they do involve changes in “consciousness” in terms of their aesthetic appreciation – those are important). I’m still wondering whether there will ever be a pretty solid “canon” of new media literary works that will have the same kind of mystical draw the “classics” of literature have had. But I’m an insider – I’m always interested when one of my students views one of these new media works with the same kind of awe I used to view the poems of, say, Ezra Pound or John Donne. History, the passing of time, adds a lot to a work.

2. What is the destiny of text in the emerging literary arts?

I don’t really know. That all hangs on how seriously the creators of digital textual works take learning how to write. Some of them are really terrible writers, or at least I don’t understand at all what they are getting at. But others are pretty good writers and also programmers, so they are in the double bind of having to teach themselves how to write for digital environments, which is akin (to me) of the first screenwriters trying to learn how to write words for films that weren’t novels or plays. It’s just a different way of writing – screenwriters don’t write long monologues for their films, for example, it just doesn’t work, and quite often they are compressing complex ideas into the form of fortune cookies, single sentences that have to say a lot. I’m not sure that all writers working with digital textuality are taking this idea of genre seriously enough – they are simply writing the way they thinking “writing” should be done regardless of how it will be presented, and in digital literature, “presentation” is a good deal of the game (like in movies). One doesn’t imagine that Virginia Woolf wrote thinking about the final typesetting of her novels, but then again (since her husband Leonard was doing it) she knew what the final product would look like. But it was still a “book” – digital writers do not have that assurance, they are creating their own “books” all the time. Digital writers are also often quite terrible designers, which doesn’t help. But several are getting there, I think. Nothing is inevitable, though – I don’t think there is a “destiny” in the sense that something is bound to happen, and if so, we are in no position to anticipate it as new technologies just change the rules all the time. Television as we know might be dead – just look at YouTube and Tivo and all that stuff – but book culture isn’t quite threatened in that way (it’s been threatened for so long by TV, movies and pop music that it’s already made its adjustments).

3. How would you describe (the process of) writing in programmable media?

Mostly involving the use of “constraints” – like the sonnet, such a popular form of quickly consumed poetry laced with subjectivity, in the way the better pop lyric is now, was a constraint. These constraints are partly socially determined, partly determined by the interface the writer has created for the presentation of the work, and also determined by the algorithms that govern the work. It can’t just be Romantic effusions, on the one hand, that don’t recognize bounds of form or length, and they can’t be simply fragmented, elliptical writing, since the avant-garde tradition is exhausted in this regard, and digital environments tend to break up text all the time already – good constraints can often gird a text against the sorts of tearing apart that algorithms inflict on it. I talk about this in Fashionable Noise, that the big difference between print text and digital text is that digital text is vulnerable to algorithms.

4. Where/when is (your) emerging literature produced, “read” or “performed”?

Sometimes in gallery exhibitions, sometimes at talks, often assigned for classes, but generally just online through links. Most of my digital work is not “read” often – I rarely have anyone come up to me quoting a line from “Dreamlife of Letters,” but it’s happened. My work has also been presented at the Remote Lounge in New York, a bar that had a television set at every seat, etc. I never managed to get a gig at a rave.

5. How do you envision the (any) future of “literature” as an art form?

Perhaps I’m conservative, but I don’t envision any huge changes quite soon. I think the fascination with the use of pure information in literary objects, especially poems, has been around for much longer than we have recognized, since Browning and Pound at least. That seems to be the main contribution of Google searches and the other aspects of freewheeling digital textuality on the web have made. In fact, the easy availability of huge piles of pure information have made the experiments of someone like David Foster Wallace a little less interesting – I think quieter, almost monastic literature will make a comeback of sorts (think Gide), like the way analog recording techniques and synth sounds made a comeback in the face of sampling and digital sequencing. If visual and animated poetry were to take over the world, it would have done so a long time ago, which isn’t to say that more and more people are going to do this type of work in the future. The fact that more poets are professional-quaility typesetters now than ever before is a sign of this.

Here are some brief descriptions of ideas for courses at Richard Stockton College, should I take a position there as a full time professor:

New Media for Children and Education

This will be a workshop course in how to design web sites and Flash applications for preschool children and for the classroom. What sort of interfaces appeal to children? How can new media augment a traditional education? Students will spend a month learning Macromedia Fireworks (an imaging program) and Flash (an interactive graphics program). We will also read and discuss children and creative educational literature and websites. For the second half of the semester, students will work on a final project that has either an educational function or is geared toward children.

Hypertext Fiction, Poetry and Non-fiction

This will be a workshop course for which the first half will be entirely devoted to writing in the various genres above with traditional “workshopping” critique sessions, and reading the classics of hypertext literature and holding up to the same values we expect of print literature. During this time, rudimentary skills in Fireworks and Dreamweaver will be acquired along with basic typesetting skills. For the second half of the semester, students will work on a final project that will encompass issues of writing, design and interactivity that characterize a successful hypertext work while keeping an eye on its print manifestation.

Writing for Video Games

In this class, we will read and play several of the “classic” video games that involve textual experiences by the users with a mind to treating the text like one would a screenplay — as a literary genre primarily associated with a visual (and highly lucrative) medium. We will consider these games in relation to the traditional genres of literature, such as drama and fiction, and read several interactive fiction texts. Students will also acquire a working knowledge of a software program or programming language (not sure which one yet), and work on crafting textual, interactive experiences in these programs.

Electronic Editing and Publishing

This is a workshop in print design (in Photoshop and Illustrator), typesetting (in Quark if they have it in the Mac lab, in Word if not) and print-on-demand services such as Lulu.com. Students will have produced a professional looking perfect bound publication by the end of the class. The content will be a collection of writing of some nature – poetry, essays, etc. – which can be either collected online or via submissions from peers. By the end of the class, each student will have conceptualized, edited, designed, typeset, and finally “published” a paperbound book through Lulu.com.

“I’m sick of these motherfucking books on my motherfucking truck!”

But I’m here, for the few of you who care, in a rather strange neighborhood on 16th and Girard, in a spacious 3-bedroom apartment (I have one roommate at the moment, looking for another) at the same price I was paying for my largish but warped place in Billysburg (and that, way under market value). But fear not: there are hipsters galore in this town–I spotted a few members of the shaggy set just yesterday–but a whole lot more!

I’ve just returned from California where I went to attend my sister Lindsay’s wedding at Green Gulch Zen Center. Click on the image below to see the Flickr photo album I made. (I’m keeping their full names and any other details off this blog to avoid Google over-exposure.)

Below that is the poem that I wrote the night before while staying at the center. Perhaps a little too Stevie Smith for your tastes but I wanted to keep it simple. The bit about the shower is a little in-joke — we could only take 2 minute showers at Green Gulch because of the water heaters, but, alas, I do do a lot of good thinking in the shower! I read it at the ceremony, so it has a bit of that Eliotic thing going also.

 186780575_5526a3203a_m.jpg

IT’S SOME REAL THING
comes down upon us
thinking us through taking a shower
where thinking is often done, and

plants us
square in the middle of the road, on a coast
which yesterday seemed barbaric
– now, of course, it’s simply scenic.

There is no speech, but silence talks,
of course, of course, it says
of course, of course, it’s frankly obvious
there are tomorrows like todays.

– Plants us
square in the middle of a waiting game
that is life, so love
which is not like waking life

cannot make a sentence that is strictly obvious
except in the half-light of our making sense.

Here are some picture taken by Abigail Child of the, uh, “production” of my play (see entry below).

“Where Stones Gather”

Ontological Hysteric Theater

Play on Words: A Poets + Theater Festival, May 12 2006.

Directed by Tony Torn

Kate Valk: Kate Valk
Hanna Schygulla: Angelica Torn
Jason Robards: Charles Bernstein
Old Men/Priests: Jim Fletcher, Pete Simpson, Tony Torn, Charles Bernstein

 kate_hanna_2.jpg

Hanna and Kate discuss ideas in the time before writing.

jason(charles).jpg

Charles Bernstein as Jason Robards

charles_kate.jpg

Jason and Kate discuss cell phones

tony_cheese.jpg

Tony Torn as the Old Priest communing with… what else? cheese, as Pete Simpson looks on

cast_3.jpg

The cast (most them) and playwright: (l-r) Angelica Torn, Kate Valk, Jim Fletcher, Charles Bernstein, BKS, Tony Torn

I know this blog can seem at times as little more than a testament to my big ego. Like, let me tell you the story about the fishing tropy AGAIN… etc. Luckily, I’ve never won a literary (or any) award in my life, with the exception of a contest on TV trivia that nabbed me my first computer, a Vic 20, in 1980 or something like that.

In any case, here is something that appeared recently, a review of several of my chapbooks by the poet Stan Mir. All of the material he writes about will eventually appear in the What Is Said to the Poet, so I guess it’s fitting this goes up with the cover below. The review appears in the online journal Fascicle, link below.

MATTER ORDERED TO BE MADE
Five Recent Chapbooks by Brian Kim Stefans

Stan Mir

The term chapbook first dawned in the minds of the poor reading public in the early nineteenth century. Its name derives from the itinerant pedlars, chapmen, who sold them. Circulation of these quaint books began as early as the sixteenth century when one was likely to find short versions of tales such as Jack the Killer and Tom Thumb usually illustrated with a few crude woodcuts. By 1800 children’s tales such as Mother Hubbard and Cock Robin were produced. Typically, they were badly written and printed. Most interestingly, these books preserved the imaginative literature in countries like England and France when the ideological climate was hostile to the fantastic.

While our political climate is hostile to any sound idea, let alone any fantastic work of the imagination, it can’t be said that our cultural climate lacks familiarity with the fantastic or the rational. After all, we have to observe from afar the doings of our government. Within our time we have all types of artist producing work that manipulates the wash of information, and this information’s errata, we experience daily. Through the rearrangement of these daily artifacts we come to understand how we might arrange ourselves within a culture. With this in mind the chapbook remains one of the viably interesting ways for the artist’s presentation of order. These little books are like biopsies of larger bodies that not only allow the writer to see more clearly, but grant readers the permission to make diagnoses as well.

Into the midst of this era that co-opts more of our attention than we realize Housepress of Calgary published Brian Kim Stefans’ POEM FORMERLY KNOWN AS “TERRORISM” and other poems.1 In the background of these poems one hears a modern soundtrack that remixes the odd phrases of a questionnaire with the data of the news, as in “ ‘Islamabad’ is not an adequate response”, utilizes the quotidian quirkiness of “They’re putting a new door in”, which has physical as well as metaphysical significance, as in a door to another dimension perhaps, and reinvents other languages, as in “Feliz Navidada”.

Continues at: http://www.fascicle.com/issue02/essays/mir1.htm

Here’s the cover to the forthcoming book of poems from Factory School’s Heretical Text Series. Photograph by Tim Davis. There appear to be some dust or scratches on this which, from what I understand, do not appear on higher resolution versions.

You will ask why there are no hairless cats or ugly fish on the cover… well, one must have variety, and this is my vegetable course. (Click to enlarge.)

04stefansCOV.jpg

IHF_work.jpg

It’s no secret that I am a huge Ian Hamilton Finlay fan. Finlay died of cancer last Monday at the age of 80. 

I was lucky enough to meet Finlay’s son, Eck, at a poetry reading I did in New York on St. Patrick’s day. I forget exactly what year this was, it must have been 1996, when the holiday fell on a Sunday, or 1995, when it fell on a Friday (the most recent one on a Saturday was 1990, when I was still in college). I was subbing for Melanie Nielson, and because of the holiday the Ear Inn didn’t want to host the reading. In any case, I read to a not very packed house at a tea shop near by with Norma Cole — the only other notable event was that I accidentally brushed dandruff into Jackson Mac Low’s soup, and I met Erica Hunt that day but didn’t know it was her because she sat alone, with her child, at the back (actually, very front) of the room, and I assume she was some woman who stopped by on a whim.

I saw Eck give a talk about his father’s work later that week at Teacher’s and Writers. Because his father was an agoraphobe, Eck used to give talks about his work around the world, which afforded him a great chance to meet poets outside of the UK. I had seen Finlay’s work in a hard-cover anthology of British Poetry that was decades old — the famous Circus poem had blown me away – and Mary Ann Caws, one of my teachers at the CUNY Grad Center years earlier, had leant me some books (she referred to him as one of the two geniuses she had ever met, the other being, I believe, Breton). So, this was a very fortuitous meeting.

I didn’t see Eck much after that, but in 1998 I went to London to spend time with Miles Champion, and while there met Thomas Evans, a good friend of both Miles’ and Eck’s, who invited me to a party at Eck’s apartment in Edinburgh. I remember being keen on seeing a reading in London at the same time at Subvoicive, the sort of equivalent of the Ear series over there, but it was an Ann Waldman reading, so I felt it was probably something I could miss as I’d seen Ann read numerous times already. (I’ll never forget the phone call I had with Tim Atkins about this dilemma — he said “a reading by Ann Waldman or a weekend on the Scottish shore… let me make your decision for you.”)

So I took the train up to Edinburgh. It was packed with football revelers who were rather dismayed that their team, Newcastle, had just lost to Arsenal in some sort of final or other. (Miles and I had been chased by Arsenal fans the night before, so I don’t think winning or losing changes much in terms of how much is imbibed.) It was early afternoon, but everyone on the train was drunk, drunk, drunk, and loud as hell. I knew I would hear it when I got up to go the bathroom, but it wasn’t so bad in the end.

But Edinburgh was a relief. The Scottish cabby who managed to find Eck’s place for me was a dear, or at least compared to London cabbies. The architecture really amazed me, and for the first time on that trip I felt like I was in another country. Not a “Blockbuster” sign in sight. The party was great — I won’t go into details, but there were Gaelic songs, an intoxicated elder Scot with an eye for a much younger lady, the reading of much poetry, and the poet Gael Turnbull, who in a reversal had visited W.C.W. in Rutherford many (many) years before.

(I’ve just learned from Wikipedia that Turnbull, who died in 2004, also created “kinetic poems,” which were “texts for installation in which the movement of the reader and/or of the text became part of the reading experience.” Maybe I should stop believing in coincidence.)

The next day was, indeed, spent driving around the Scottish shore and through the hills of Fife, accompanied by Eck, two friends of his, the daughter of one of the friends named Sinead (who sang several of the Gaelic songs the night previous), and Thomas. I saw cows on hillsides that looked right out of the cover of Atom Heart Mother. We visited an artist who lived in a converted movie theater at the peak of a cliff that overlooked the shore, and I sat with Thomas on that shore as he regaled me with lines memorized from the letters of Jack Kerouac. Only an English poet would bother to memorize such things written in a haze of alcohol as if they were Samuel Johnson, but I certainly never faulted him for it! (Now that I think of it, it might have been Clark Coolidge he was quoting to me.)

We also visited Eck’s childhood vacation home, which was overrun by spiders, and spent a good hour with Eck’s mother, Sue, who helped build Little Sparta. She and Ian, who had known each other since childhood growing up on those hills, were estranged, but both still lived in Fife. I also saw gorse, which is good because now I can use the word “gorse” in poems and sound like I know what I mean, but the opportunity hasn’t yet arisen.

I’m making a short story long, but this really was one of my finest weekends. I have several beautiful photographs to show you if you ever want to visit me.

We did finally get to the garden, the road to which is (if I remember correctly) only marked by the most crude of signs. Eck told me that Ian wasn’t so keen on having visitors because he felt the poems “weren’t there yet” — the foliage had not yet accrued to the degree that was ideal for their presentation. But because I was with Eck — who I didn’t think liked me the night before when I was an uninvited guest but who turned out to be very friendly – we got in. (One memory also from that trip — I sang one of the few songs of my own that I memorized a cappella in the car as we were driving, a feat that will never be reproduced in my lifetime, or in yours.)

We approached the garden, I with great anticipation. It was almost anti-climactic to come upon Ian sitting on a stone bench in his long rubber boots looking at one of his poems right there at the entrance to the place. I would have much rather we had to muck around in his living room looking at stuff while he was upstairs getting decent. Nonetheless, the poem he was looking at was beautiful, and though we barely said anything to each other, I could tell immediately that he was a very gentle and kind man, not quite what I expected for a guy who lost a commission in France because he wanted the piece to be include a long row of working guillotines.

I’d tell you about walking around the garden and all the amazing things I saw, but you can look at the photographs (links below) and get your own sense of what it was like. Specific memories: going into the Temple of Apollo, which had once been a sort of small museum of IHF works but was now closed to the public because Ian had not been able to have it declared a religious site (rather than a cultural site, which is taxed much more). It was now a storage room — I saw several boxes of works that had just been shipped to Finlay from his collaborators (I photographed the mailing label on one of them).

The other memory was of Eck and his lady friend whose name I can’t remember rowing around in the “Sea Eck” in the pond there. She was doing all the rowing, Eck was doing all the talking. Somehow this seemed hilarious to me because she was rather skinny and didn’t look exactly like she was enjoying the imbalance of physical exertion. But that might just have been my satirist’s eye acting up.

The hills are as bare as they appear in the photographs, and the parts covered in the foliage in the garden are as green and rich. The stones you see above, so difficult to photograph, are littered (if that’s quite the word) on the outer edge of the garden, and they read: “The present order is the disorder of the future.” I am not always able to quote this line properly — I even had to look it up just now — because I somehow believe the opposite to be true, but neither version cancels the other out. I’m not sure which is more optimistic than the other; it really all depends on where you sit on the Foucauldian fence (oh god, did I just use the word “Foucauldian”?).

We didn’t see Ian again until we left. There is a photograph in my shoebox of Ian and me with the sun setting behind us — a pretty awful photograph, as the sun really should have been upon us. You can’t see either of our faces very well, but his arms are crossed and I am wearing my famous red gingham shirt. I was too nervous (and physically exhausted, given the previous evening’s drunkenness — my entire London trip’s drunkenness, you won’t be surprised to hear) to say anything significant. But then again, I hardly expected to hit it off right away with Finlay, we are from quite different worlds. I’ve only ever rented, for example. I could have told him that my doctor was William Carlos Williams’ son, but that’s an ice breaker that works on too few occasions. I could have also told him that Robert Smithson was also from Rutherford — their work seems to have something to do with each other — but I didn’t know it at the time.

I wrote an article about Finlay for the St. Mark’s Poetry Project Newsletter which Lisa Jarnot was kind enough to publish. John Tranter republished it in Jacket, and I think it convinced him to have an entire section devoted to Finlay’s work, including a really excellent (much superior to mine) article by Drew Milne. I encourage anyone who reads this blog to take a peek at these articles and also at the links to photographs below.

I don’t have anything terribly profound to say about his work right now, except perhaps that he really enriched my thinking on what it means to be a “postmodern” artist — he was not “postmodern” in any convenient sense of the term, there is/was nothing obvious about Ian Hamilton Finlay, his politics, his aesthetics or his philosophy. He is the first concrete poet I knew whose work actually pointed to a larger world view that was not entirely a meditation on text and its paradoxes, or some easy comment on modern culture – his “vision of sweet philosophy” permeated everything he did, and he created an easy transport between his wee garden in Scotland and the greater (and most frightening) themes of Western Civ.

Ok, that’s a bunch of abstraction for you, but I did use the word “Foucauldian” earlier. He used many of the same techniques that artists like Bruce Nauman (script in neon lights) and several other conceptual and performance artists (words on the side of buildings, on gallery walls, appropriation, not to mention the “crates” event) but it all pointed to some vision that was, on the one hand, sublime, historical and full of a sense of order and the ideal, but on the other anchored in the particular, the ephemeral. The garden may very well sink into ruin, but that seems to have been part of the plan (again, an echo of Smithson here, whose Spiral Jetty was meant to degrade beautifully, then disappear). Most of us are hoping for something a little better than that, at least for the immediate future.

I should mention that his poetry from the pre-concrete days is really great; I highly recommend The Dancers Inherit the Party, published by Polygon in Edinburgh. The following bit, aimed at his arch rival Hugh MacDiarmid (they used the same post office to send blistering letters to each other through the newspapers) is one of my all time favorites, by anyone. (In fact, I rip off one of his moves in the Yoda stanza in “Five Coiled Stanzas” below.)

from Orkney Lyrics 

Mansie Considers the Sea in the Manner of Hugh MacDiarmid

The sea, I think, is lazy,
It just obeys the moon.
— All the same I remember what Engels said:
‘Freedom is the consciousness of necessity.’

Thanks to mIEKAL aND for sending some of these links along to the ubuweb listserv. I append the New York Times obituary since it will eventually become a pay-only piece of reading; I hope they (and Jeffrey Jullich) don’t mind.

Ian Hamilton Finlay’s Garden Gallery
Photography by Philip Hunter
http://www.perlesvaus.easynet.co.uk/hippeis/gallery/little_sparta/

The Little Sparta Trust
http://www.littlesparta.co.uk/

Little Sparta on Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/littlesparta/

The Death of Piety
Ian Hamilton Finlay in conversation with Nagy Rashwan
http://jacketmagazine.com/15/rash-iv-finlay.html

The Mark Scroggins
The Piety of Terror
http://jacketmagazine.com/15/finlay-by-scroggins.html

BKS on Ian Hamilton Finlay
http://jacketmagazine.com/15/finlay-by-stefans.html

Adorno’s Hut
Drew Milne
http://www.jacketmagazine.com/15/finlay-milne.html

Ian Hamilton Finlay on ubu.com
http://www.ubu.com/historical/finlay/finlay.html 

Ian Hamilton Finlay, 80, Poet and Conceptual Artist, Dies

By KEN JOHNSON for The New York Times
Published: March 31, 2006

Ian Hamilton Finlay, a Scottish poet and conceptual artist known for his neo-Classical-style sculptures inscribed with poetic texts as well as for his home and garden, an imaginative echo of ancient Rome in the Pentland Hills of Lanarkshire, died on Monday at a hospital in Edinburgh. He was 80.

The cause was cancer, said Katherine Chan, director of the Nolan/Eckman Gallery, which represents Mr. Finlay in New York.

The famously contentious Mr. Finlay began calling his home Little Sparta in 1980, partly to symbolize his refusal to compromise with the local authorities over whether a building dedicated to Apollo should be taxed as a religious or a commercial structure.

Now maintained by a foundation, Little Sparta resembles the home of an ancient Roman philosopher-poet. Rustic and Classical-style stone carvings bearing literary quotations have been carefully placed throughout the property. One stone block, seemingly antique and tilted in the ground as if it were a ruin, presents the neatly chiseled words of the French revolutionary Louis de Saint-Just: “The world has been empty since the Romans.”

But the grounds are not completely given over to nostalgic traditionalism. Images of 20th-century warfare are also distributed about. The two posts of a stone-and-brick gateway, for example, are each topped by an oversize stone carving of a hand grenade.

Mr. Finlay conceived and designed his sculptures, but hired craftsmen to produce them. He also created works for exhibitions in Europe and the United States and for public commissions. Although he had agoraphobia, which restricted his traveling, he had an internationally recognized career, and many visitors made the pilgrimage to Little Sparta.

Mr. Finlay was on the short list for Britain’s Turner Prize for contemporary art in 1985 and received the honorary appointment of a Commander of the British Empire in 2002. His work was selected to be part of the 2006 Tate Triennial, a survey of British contemporary art now on view at Tate Britain in London.

Ian Hamilton Finlay was born on Oct. 28, 1925, in Nassau, the Bahamas, where his father was a bootlegger who smuggled rum into the United States during Prohibition. At 6 Mr. Finlay was sent to boarding school in Scotland. War cut short his education at 13, when he was evacuated to Orkney, an archipelago at the northern tip of Scotland. As a teenager he briefly attended the Glasgow School of Art before being called up in 1942 for duty with the Royal Army Service Corps.

After the war, Mr. Finlay worked as a shepherd while producing paintings; short plays, which were broadcast by the BBC; and stories, which were published in The Herald of Glasgow.

In 1961 Mr. Finlay founded the Wild Hawthorn Press, which initially published contemporary poets like Louis Zukofsky and Lorine Niedecker but later focused mainly on Mr. Finlay’s poetry. In the early 60’s he became interested in concrete poetry, in which the visual appearance of words was meant to count as much as the literary meaning. He also began producing short poems sandblasted on glass. One read simply, “Wave Rock.”

In 1966 Mr. Finlay and his second wife, Sue, moved to the cottage and grounds that would become Little Sparta, a patch of highlands then called Stonypath, 30 miles southwest of Edinburgh. It was to be his home for the rest of his life. Mr. Finlay’s marriage to his first wife, Marion, ended in divorce. He is survived by his wife and their children, Alec Finlay and Ailie Simpson.

Today visitors to Little Sparta are greeted by a bronze plaque mounted on a brick wall that nicely sums up Mr. Finlay’s independent, high-minded and mercurial spirit: above the imposing, precisely modeled image of a machine gun, sentiments from the poet Virgil read, “Flute, begin with me Arcadian notes.”

Another poem “about” me, or at least the letters in my name. Came in last week, soon after the aforementioned Korean food day, but I decided to wait as, well, I can’t just post poems “about” me on this website. This one is by Juliette Lee, one of the authors of the group poem below.

She is, besides being an MFA student at UMass, the inventor of “gochunaise,” a “spicy red pepper paste spread that folks can use to make egg salads and the like.” When I was very little, my mother used to refer to my pee-pee as my “gochu,” so, um, I’m not sure how I feel about this.

I, by the way, have invented “bulgoka,” which is a cross between baloney and bulgoki. Yum.

Bring It 

Burned, rioted, idolized, annulled, new.
Koans impeach my star-terrified eyes,
fractious and now soluble.

But reticulated imminence announces, “Never
kill in mourning.” Surely triumph
elegizes for all (non)native speakers.

Bring rain in a new kiln,
(inside, manmade stereophonic
tremors). Emerge forgotten. Another
nearby story

begets runaways. Is anything
nonprofit? Kneel into my
sentence. Try escape. Framed
and now stable.

« Previous PageNext Page »