September 27, 2002

David Choe

What did I read this morning, when I woke up way too early and had gotten bored working on the redesign of THE BLOG? Well, a book by David Choe -- the critics rave:

I hate david choe why? Because he makes me feel
old,tired,talentless, and unwilling to take chances.
As you might expect, Choe is young,energetic,
prodigiously talented, and takes many chances.
his use (abuse?) of the English language is fresh and uncontrived;
His schizophrenically restless art school technique
( dropping macaroni noodles, seamlessly blending clip art,
photo collage and childhood scrawling)
is startlingly unpretentious; and his utter fearless approach
to sexuality is a cold blast of water in the desert of inhibition
and near-puritanical sexual avoidance inherent
in almost all of American media.
-Robet Young editor of The Comics Interpreter

I couldn't have said it better myself. He really is an awful speller, not much of a typographer -- but none of these are faults as every "mistake" he makes is more interesting than most of our successes (take a look at the Bauhausian angles of this page, for instance, and tell me if they make you want to get off the couch and party). There is a fantastic little sequence called "Yoffee Toffee" about his trip to the beach in Gaza and visit with the black Jews of Israel in the town of Dimona. The writing is really fresh, not at all indebted to the Beatnik line but all L.A.

If you are interested in this guy check out www.davidchoe.com. And here's my first attempt at putting an image in THE BLOG.


Posted by Brian Stefans at September 27, 2002 02:24 PM
Comments

Hey there Brian, If you're in or around the Sf bay area on thursday jan 7, 2003 stop by UpperPlayground (www.upperplayground.com) @ 228 fillmore st in sf.

Dave's not going to be there but some of his work will be in a group show (we all went to school together) should be fun!

Posted by: joseph to at January 7, 2003 02:20 PM

The rest of our conversion follows a similar vein. Instead of going through line by line, let's just compare end results: when the transition is complete, the code that used to read:

Posted by: Sampson at January 18, 2004 05:50 PM

Inside each stack frame is a slew of useful information. It tells the computer what code is currently executing, where to go next, where to go in the case a return statement is found, and a whole lot of other things that are incredible useful to the computer, but not very useful to you most of the time. One of the things that is useful to you is the part of the frame that keeps track of all the variables you're using. So the first place for a variable to live is on the Stack. This is a very nice place to live, in that all the creation and destruction of space is handled for you as Stack Frames are created and destroyed. You seldom have to worry about making space for the variables on the stack. The only problem is that the variables here only live as long as the stack frame does, which is to say the length of the function those variables are declared in. This is often a fine situation, but when you need to store information for longer than a single function, you are instantly out of luck.

Posted by: Jesse at January 18, 2004 05:51 PM

The rest of our conversion follows a similar vein. Instead of going through line by line, let's just compare end results: when the transition is complete, the code that used to read:

Posted by: Robert at January 18, 2004 05:51 PM

We can see an example of this in our code we've written so far. In each function's block, we declare variables that hold our data. When each function ends, the variables within are disposed of, and the space they were using is given back to the computer to use. The variables live in the blocks of conditionals and loops we write, but they don't cascade into functions we call, because those aren't sub-blocks, but different sections of code entirely. Every variable we've written has a well-defined lifetime of one function.

Posted by: Phillipa at January 18, 2004 05:51 PM

Note the new asterisks whenever we reference favoriteNumber, except for that new line right before the return.

Posted by: Hieronimus at January 18, 2004 05:51 PM

CD player, but I shouldn't viagra assume that all music listeners didrex are like me. What happens fioricet when I get an anti-rap person xenical who is assaulted by "Bombs ultram Over Baghdad" at volume 10? meridia Still, it's something to think phentermine

Posted by: didrex at February 11, 2004 09:15 PM